Skip to main content

How school lunches can signal misguided parenting

December 13, 2016
A school is an interesting place to observe changing trends in child-rearing. Readers of my generation will recall the brown bag with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, two carrot sticks and an apple. On a good day, there was a cookie. Oh sure, there were those children whose lunches I envied; one friend had just three-quarters of a tuna-on-lettuce sandwich, and another had what I thought was the most exotic sandwich of all: pepperoni on white bread. But in the end, the theme was the same: sandwich, vegetable, fruit. And, I don’t recall ever having a snack time, although I do remember listening to my stomach growl all morning.
Today, most children bring a daunting array of foods in their lunchbox, with as many as eight selections from which to choose. Whether healthy or not, the sheer variety of foods is curious to me and perhaps a little window into larger parenting trends.
Parents (and teachers) hope to offer children healthy and happy experiences to nurture them and help them grow. The trends now are undoubtedly leaning toward offering a wide array of experiences. Like the lunchbox, the dizzying selection of enrichment experiences offered to children both in and out of school may be viewed as a great opportunity and a positive statement about social concern for child welfare. Instinctively, however, I pine for a little more simplicity.
An early lesson for young parents is offering a fussy toddler just a few options to choose from. It is easier for children to manage themselves with clear and limited options. It is step one in learning to make good choices and to collaborate, cooperate and compromise. I love food, and have an adventurous palate, but at any one meal, I like a few good food pairings, which I can thoroughly savor. Variety may be the spice of life, but do we have to experience it all at once?
Just as a 5-year-old looks at the smorgasbord in their lunchbox and wonders what to eat, generally picking a little of this and that and perhaps finishing nothing, we encourage children to experience in bulk and perhaps savor little. While admittedly pushing this analogy too far, I think childhood “grazing” highlights what seems to be the growing tendency for parents to offer children as much as they can to forego any immediate disappointments. The long-term risk is teaching children to expect others to offer them a great deal and to be easily disappointed if the standard is not met.
Simple, clear choices help children become independent decision-makers. Good parenting or teaching decisions are framed around what is best for the child, balancing the needs of the present with those of the long run. Decisions that are framed around what makes me feel like I’ve done a good job as a parent or teacher are missing the point. The two perspectives result in a fine, but critical, distinction.
There is something to be said for getting a little hungry, eating everything in that bag lunch and feeling satisfied — I mean that literally and figuratively. Teaching children to dabble rather than dig in, pick and choose instead of following through, or watch parents jump through hoops instead of just accepting what’s offered, is a trend that seems headed in the wrong direction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Merits of an Alternative Education

March, 2020 As an educator who has taught in both mainstream and alternative learning environments, I’m often asked to describe our educational model as it compares to traditional New York state public schools. How do we know that kids are learning if we’re not officially and systematically testing them? How can kids stay motivated to work without letter or number grades to distinguish their status in relation to their peers? How can kids learn to respect their teachers if they’re calling them by their first names? There are no quick answers, but when I think about the work that we do every day and the outcomes of the children we’ve served, the guiding principle that comes to mind, and one that really defines our approach is this: mutual respect. When we respect that children are individuals who come to us with unique interests, capabilities, personalities and goals, we’re able to reach them as such. Each child will head in a unique direction, and it’s our responsibility to

Critical Literacy in the History Classroom

By Alyssa Binns Gunderson, published on August 20, 2019 in the Auburn Citizen We are living in the midst of a huge shift in the way the world records and understands history. In the earliest days of human civilization, history was shared through oral tradition. Stories were used to create a shared understanding of the world and how it works. As humans progressed, history became a written narrative, with people whose education and circumstances allowed, sharing their observations, opinions and impressions on paper. As printing developed and publishing became an industry, this information was further filtered through the lenses of those who had the power and capital to distribute it. In America, this means that until recently, history has been funneled through the privileged minds and hands of wealthy or middle class white men. I don’t mean to imply that women and people of color haven’t passed along their own histories — we certainly have — but when we look back on the iconic heroes o

Teaching Black History

Students visit the Harriet Tubman statue outside the Equal Rights Heritage Center in Auburn, NY Themed history months are a mixed bag.  In an ideal world we’d all be teaching a diverse and balanced human history and there would be no need to focus on a particular race, culture, or gender for one month out of 12.  That said, the reality of our country and our classrooms is not ideal, so themed history months remind everyone to dig a little deeper and go beyond the white, male, colonist worldview perspective.  When done right, Black History Month is an opportunity to celebrate the positive contributions and accomplishments that black people have made in the United States and throughout the world.   When we teach black history to children we should start with icons who have positively shaped our culture.  It is easy to focus on civil rights leaders, and they are obviously important, but young children also need to see the faces of black poets, musicians, scientists, doctors,